Thursday, March 19, 2020
The eNotes Blog Grammar How-To That, Which, andWho
Grammar How-To That, Which, andWho This is Part Four in our Grammar How-To Series. Iââ¬â¢ll be brief. It matters, though maybe not the way you think it does. Or maybe exactly the way you think it does. Take the test and find out. 1. Choose the sentence that makes the most sense. a) Edgar Allan Poeââ¬â¢s ââ¬Å"The Cask of Amontilladoâ⬠that is about a crazy guy who bricks up his enemy behind a wall is an excellent read. b) Edgar Allan Poeââ¬â¢s ââ¬Å"The Black Cat,â⬠that is about a crazy guy who bricks up his wife behind a wall, is an excellent read. c) Edgar Allan Poeââ¬â¢s ââ¬Å"The Tell-Tale Heart,â⬠which is about a crazy guy who buries an old man beneath his floorboards, seems familiar somehow. 2. Choose the sentence that makes the most sense. a) I owe a debt of gratitude to John Steinbeck, whose novel Theà Grapes of Wrath motivated me to clean my room, do my dishes, and accomplish anything that was not reading his novel. b) I also am indebted to Ernest Hemingway who wrote The Old Man and the Sea and gave me a deeper appreciation for allegory and a powerful dislike of fishing. c) Finally, I would like to thank Herman Melvilleââ¬â¢s Moby-Dick that cured my insomnia and redoubled my determination to avoid ocean fishing. Answers: 1. c à 2. a Letââ¬â¢s start with what the sticklers say. For those grammarians with a dash up their semicolon, that should only be used for restrictive clauses, and which for nonrestrictive clauses. The part of me that gets her hyphens in a wad over these issues kind of likes that. The truth, though, is that more and more people are using which restrictively, and itââ¬â¢s particularly common in British English. So if you talk about lifts and torches, or if youââ¬â¢re a free spirit when it comes to your grammar, I canââ¬â¢t prevent you from continuing on your wayward path. So whatââ¬â¢s a restrictive clause? You use them when you need to restrict the number of things you could be talking about. The following sentences contain italicized restrictive clauses: I need a theme that will engage readers in this fascinating grammar post. Unfortunately, the only theme that I can come up with relates to the movie that I watched last night. That means the theme that will elucidate the mysteries of relative clauses for you is Jurassic Park. In each of those cases, the italicized segment is restrictive because it helps identify exactly which theme Iââ¬â¢m talking about. For example, in the first one, I donââ¬â¢t want just any theme- I need one that will fascinate (ignore the jibe that just came to the tip of your tongue). Also, the only themes on the planet are not ââ¬Å"movies I watched last nightâ⬠and ââ¬Å"Jurassic Parkâ⬠(though it did seem that way to me at the time), so it makes sense for me to make those clauses restrictive. What, then, is a nonrestrictive clause? Think of it like a parenthetical asides of nonrestrictive clauses are italicized below: Under her seat Lex found a flashlight, which seemed a useful tool at the time. And yet is a flashlight, which nobody told her to turn on, really a useful tool when you are hiding from a large carnivorous dinosaur? The flashlight, which attracts the attention of the light- and motion-sensitive T-rex, is not a useful tool for Lex at this time. In the first and second examples, even if I got rid of which seemed a useful tool at the time and which nobody told her to turn on, youââ¬â¢d still know which flashlight Iââ¬â¢m talking about. It would be pointless to restrict my meaning to only flashlights that seemed useful at the time, because there was only one flashlight in the car. In the third example, as Lex should have known, there was no flashlight in the world that would not attract the attention of the dinosaur overhead; thus Iââ¬â¢m at liberty to use a nonrestrictive clause. What about who? Who (or whose, whom, etc.) can be used with either restrictive or nonrestrictive clauses. Sadly, however, you still have to know the difference between the two, because you need to know where to put your commas. Commas should always be used to set off your nonrestrictive clauses. No commas means your nonrestrictive clause is suddenly restrictive, no matter what word youââ¬â¢ve used to begin it. For example, it would not make sense to write Lex who was lucky not to die during the flashlight debacle responds poorly to life-threatening situations. There are not two Lexes in Jurassic Park (which is a good thing, because otherwise nobody would have survived the movie), so thereââ¬â¢s no need for you to make the clause restrictive by omitting the comma. It would be better to write Lex, who was lucky not to die during the flashlight debacle, responds poorly to life-threatening situations. Itââ¬â¢s a good idea, however, to use a restrictive clause in the sentence The grandchild who got stuck in the tree was only marginally more intelligent. Since there are two grandchildren in the movie, the phrase who got stuck in the tree restricts my meaning and lets you know which of the foolish kids Iââ¬â¢m talking about.
Tuesday, March 3, 2020
How to Improve Editorial Strategy with Tara Clapper [PODCAST]
How to Improve Editorial Strategy with Tara Clapper [PODCAST] Creating an editorial calendar can be a challenge. How can you decide how often to post to your blog without wasting time and energy- or leaving your readers wanting for either more content or more quality? Thatââ¬â¢s the topic of todayââ¬â¢s show: maintaining consistency and a high level of quality while publishing at the right intervals for maximum reader engagement. Our guest is Tara Clapper, who previously managed the blog at SEMrush and nowà works for Express Writers. She has honed the blog publication process and has a lot of insight to share with our listeners on when to blog and how to create an effective editorial calendar. Some of the topics that weââ¬â¢ll discuss today include: Taraââ¬â¢s background with SEMrush, including how she learned to balance quality with quantity when it came to posting on the blog. How far out to plan content, and how helps Taraââ¬â¢s whole team stay updated and focused on whatââ¬â¢s coming up next. Why working about one month ahead works well for Tara, and how having that ââ¬Å"cushion of daysâ⬠helps when something urgent comes up that needs to be squeezed in. Why insisting on good pitches from guest authors saves time in the long run. Tips on organizing when you have a lot of different projects happening at once.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)